##PAGE1##

WP No. 21184 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-03-2026

CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

WP No. 21184 of 2023 and WMP.No.20592 of 2023

S.Thangamani S/o.Sennimalai Gounder,

No.1/278, Pallakaatu Thottam, K.S.N. Puram Post, Palladam-641 662,

Tiruppur District.

..Petitioner

Vs

1. The Inspector General Of Registration Registration Department, Chennai-28.

2. The District Registrar (administration)

O/o.The District Registrar, Tiruppur-641 602.

3. The Sub Registrar, O/o.The Sub Registrar,

Palladam, Tiruppur District.

4. S.Saminathan S/o.Sennimalai Counder, Old No.1/227, New

No.1/276, Pallakaadu Thottam, K.Iyyampalayam Village, Palladam Taluk,

Tiruppur District.

5. Sulochana W/o.Saminathan, Old No.1/227,

New No.1/276, Pallakaadu Thottam, K.Iyyampalayam Village, Palladam Taluk,

Tiruppur District.

6. R.Subramaniam

__________

Page1 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 22/04/2026 11:45:51 am )

WP No. 21184 of 2023

S/o.Ramasamy, No.1/228, Lakshmi Thottam, Anuppapatti Village,

Palladam Taluk, Tiruppur District.

..Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to cancel the Deed of Cancellation of Power of Attorney executed by the 4th respondent vide Doc. No.2324/2021 dated 08.02.2021 and subsequent Deed of rectification dated 13.05.2023 in Doc. No.8852/2023 on the record of the 3rd respondent and further directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate

legal actions against the 3rd respondent.

For Petitioner: Mr S.Sithirai Anandam

For Respondents: Ms.K.Aswini Devi (R1 to R3)

Additional Government Pleader Mr.E.K.Kumaresan (R4 to R6)

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 3rd respondent

to cancel the Deed of Cancellation of Power of Attorney executed by the 4th respondent vide Doc. No.2324/2021 dated 08.02.2021 and subsequent Deed of rectification dated 13.05.2023 in Doc. No.8852/2023 on the record of the 3rd respondent and further direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate legal

actions against the 3rd respondent.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the

petitioner along with the 4^th respondent, his brother Palanisamy and two others __________

Page2 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 22/04/2026 11:45:51 am )

WP No. 21184 of 2023

jointly executed a Power of Attorney Deed in favour of one Jomi D.Joseph vide Doc.No.622/2011 dated 23.04.2008 in respect of the subject lands,belonging to the petitioner. While so, the 4^th respondent unilaterally cancelled the said Power of Attorney Document vide Doc.No.2324 of 2021 dated 08.02.2021 stating that the petitioner had died and he is willing to administer the property, without even

informing the Power Holder.

2.1.Further he would submit that the 3^rd respondent with collusion with

the 4^th respondent has registered the said Cancellation of Power of Attorney document, without verifying the relevant documents. In this regard, the petitioner made a representation to the respondents 1 and 2 on 15.05.2023, to take necessary action against the respondents 3 to 6. But no action has been taken on the same till date. Hence, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition

seeking for the aforesaid relief.

3.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the

respondents 1 to 3 would submit that since the Sub Registrar/3^rd respondent has no authority to cancel the Deed of Cancellation of Power of Attorney, the respondents 1 and 2 will pass orders on the representation of the petitioner only on the aspect of collusion of the 3^rd respondent with the respondents 4 to 6, while registering the cancellation of Power of Attorney document, as alleged by

the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, after conducting due enquiry.

__________

Page3 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 22/04/2026 11:45:51 am )

WP No. 21184 of 2023

4. Heard both sides. Perused the records.

5. In the case