SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 36352

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
K.Mariappan – Appellant
Versus
United India Insurance Compa – Respondent



##PAGE1##

C.M.P.(MD)No.8491 of 2024 in Cros.Obj(MD)No.SR 41483 of 2024

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATE : 27.03.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

C.M.P.(MD)No.8491 of 2024 in

Cros.Obj(MD)No.SR 41483 of 2024 in

C.M.A(MD)No.665 of 2024

C.M.P.(MD)No.8491 of 2024 :

K.Mariappan : Petitioner/Cross Objector Vs.

1.United India Insurance Company Ltd, through its Branch Manager,

Having Office at D.No.5/1, Alagu Bagavathy Complex,

Kailasapuram, Tirunelveli Junction.

2.M.A.Shahul Hameed : Respondents

PRAYER in C.M.P(MD)No.8491 of 2024: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 93 days in filing the Cross Objection in C.M.A(MD)No.665 of 2024, which was filed against the order, dated 22.08.2023 in M.C.O.P.No.801 of 2019 on the file of the

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Judge, Tirunelveli.

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/04/2026 11:48:19 am )

##PAGE2##

C.M.P.(MD)No.8491 of 2024 in Cros.Obj(MD)No.SR 41483 of 2024

PRAYER in Cros.Obj (MD)No.SR 41483 of 2022 : Cross Objection filed under Order 41 Rule 22 of C.P.C., against CMA(MD)No.665 of 2024, which was filed against the order, dated 22.08.2023 in M.C.O.P.No.801 of 2019 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Judge,

Tirunelveli.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Sivasubramanian

ORDER

The above application has been filed under Section 5 of Limitation

Act, to condone the delay of 93 days in filing the Cross Objection in C.M.A(MD)No.665 of 2024, which was filed against the order, dated 22.08.2023 in M.C.O.P.No.801 of 2019 on the file of the Motor Accident

Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Judge, Tirunelveli.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned

counsel appearing for the petitioner/Cross objector would submit that they are

not pressing this application and also made an endorsement to that effect.

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/04/2026 11:48:19 am )

##PAGE3##

C.M.P.(MD)No.8491 of 2024 in Cros.Obj(MD)No.SR 41483 of 2024

3. In view of the same, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed

as not pressed. Consequently, the Cross Objection is rejected at the SR stage

itself. No costs.

27.03.2026

NCC : Yes /No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

das To

1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Judge, Tirunelveli.

2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section,

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/04/2026 11:48:19 am )

##PAGE4##

C.M.P.(MD)No.8491 of 2024 in Cros.Obj(MD)No.SR 41483 of 2024 K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.

das

C.M.P.(MD)No.8491 of 2024 in

Cros.Obj(MD)No.SR 41483 of 2024 in

C.M.A(MD)No.665 of 2024

Dated: 27.03.2026

4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/04/2026 11:48:19 am )

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top