SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 36469

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI
P.Sivasundarapandian – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 25.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI P.Sivasundarapandian ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by the Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Palayanur Police Station, Sivagangai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Idol Wing CID Office, Madurai. ... Respondents PRAYER :-Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to complete the enquiry in C.S.R.No.190 of 2025 dated 18.06.2025 on the file of the 2nd respondent and to take effective steps to trace and recover the stolen idols of Arulmigu Sri Kottarudaya Aiyanar Temple situated at Keelarangiyam Village, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 17.02.2026 within a time frame fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Antony Arulraj For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate(criminal side)

ORDER

Seeking to complete enquiry in in C.S.R.No.190 of 2025 dated

18.06.2025 on the file of the 2nd respondent and to take effective steps to trace and recover the stolen idols of Arulmigu Sri Kottarudaya Aiyanar Temple situated at Keelarangiyam Village, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 17.02.2026, this writ petition is filed.

2. The learned Government Advocate(Criminal side) submitted that the case has been transferred to the Idol Wing.

3. Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials available on record.

4. In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate(crl.side), the Inspector of Police, Idol Wing CID Office, Madurai is suo motu impleaded as 3rd respondent

5. It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made to a Statutory Authority, there is a duty cast upon the respondent to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in one way or other instead of keeping the same pending indefinitely. As such, non- consideration of the representation made by the Statutory Authority would amount to dereliction of duty and hence, this Court will be justified in invoking the extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

6. Without going into the merits of the case, this Court directs the 3rd respondents to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 17.02.2026 and conclude the enquiry within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The 3rd respondent is directed to appraise the progress of the investigation to the 1st respondent every Friday. The 1st respondent is directed to monitor the enquiry conducted by the 3rd respondent.

7. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

25.03.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No gbg To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Palayanur Police Station, Sivagangai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Idol Wing CID Office, Madurai.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

L.VICTORIA GOWRI,J gbg

25.03.2026

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top