SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 36491

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
J.ANITHA MARY @ NAGARANI – Appellant
Versus
C.W.JERVIN ALOSIUS – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.03.2026 CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR and C.M.P.(MD)No.2216 of 2022 J.Anitha Mary @ Nagarani ... Petitioner/

Respondent Vs.

C.W.Jervin Alosius ... Respondent/

Petitioner Prayer : This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 C.P.C., to withdraw and transfer the above I.D.O.P.No.92 of 2021 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Tiruppur and transfer the same to the Court of learned Family Court at Trichy.

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Jameel Arasu For Respondent : No appearance

ORDER

The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to withdraw the case from the file of the Principal District Court, Tiruppur, in I.D.O.P.No.

92 of 2021 and transfer the same to the file of the Family Court, Trichy.

2. Despite the receipt of Court notice, the respondent has not turned up. Moreover, notice was also served on the counsel appearing for the respondent before the trial Court, but there was no representation for the respondent earlier. Even today, there is no representation for the respondent.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

4. It is not in dispute that the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 10.07.2011 as per the Christian Rites and Customs and that subsequently there arose some misunderstanding and they are living separately. It is also not in dispute that the respondent filed a petition in I.D.O.P.No.92 of 2021 seeking divorce and the same is pending on the file of the Principal District Court, Tiruppur.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is residing at Trichy and finds it difficult to travel to Tiruppur to attend the hearings along with her 10 years old male child.

6. In the case of N.C.V.Aishwarya Vs. A.S.Saravana Karthik Sha reported in 2022 Live Law (SC) 627, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has reiterated the position with generally, it is the wife's convenience, which must be looked at while considering the transfer petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the relevant passage is extracted hereunder :

“The cardinal principle for exercise of power under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer of the suit, appeal or other proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer, the Courts have to take into consideration the economic soundness of both the parties, the social strata of the spouses and their behavioural pattern, their standard of life prior to the marriage and subsequent thereto and the circumstances of both the parties in eking out their livelihood and under whose protective umbrella they are seeking their sustenance to life. Given the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society, generally, it is the wife's convenience which must be looked at while considering transfer.", the bench observed.”

7. Considering the above facts and circumstances and also taking note of the fact that the petitioner is residing at Trichy, this Court is of the view that the case in I.D.O.P.No.92 of 2021 is ordered to be withdrawn from the file of the Principal District Court, Tiruppur, and transfer the same to the file of the Family Court, Trichy. Accordingly, the learned Principal District Judge, Tiruppur, is hereby directed to transmit the entire records in I.D.O.P.No.92 of 2021 to the file of the Family Court, Trichy, within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on receiving the case bundle, the learned Judge, Family Court, Trichy, is directed to take up the petition on file and proceed in accordance with law.

8. With the above direction, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

24.03.2026 NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No csm To

1. The Principal District Judge, Tiruppur.

2. The Judge, Family Court, Tr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top