SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 36529

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI
R.Thavamani – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Police – Respondent



##PAGE1##

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1550 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

Dated : 23.03.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

W.P.Crl(MD)No.1550 of 2026

R.Thavamani ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District,

Madurai.

2.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by The Inspector of Police,

Alanganallur Police Station, Madurai District.

3.P.Karthika ... Respondents

PRAYER :-Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to dispose the representation made by the Petitioner dated 22.12.2025 to the 1st Respondent

within stipulated time frame as fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Jayaramachandran

For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate(Criminal Side)

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/04/2026 05:09:42 pm )

##PAGE2##

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1550 of 2026

ORDER

Seeking to direct respondent police to dispose of the petitioner's

representation, dated 22.12.2025, this writ petition is filed.

2. Since no adverse order is passed against the 3rd respondent, notice to

the 3rd respondent is dispensed with.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government

Advocate(Crl.side), on instructions, submitted that already both the petitioner and the 3rd respondent were put on notice and enquiry was conducted and the same was closed directing the respective parties to work out the remedy before

the appropriate Civil Court.

4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the

materials available on record.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently submitted that even

without requiring the 3rd respondent to appear before the 2nd respondent police, the complaint given by the petitioner has been closed. In this regard, the 2nd respondent police is directed to issue summons to the petitioner as well as the

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/04/2026 05:09:42 pm )

##PAGE3##

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1550 of 2026

3rd respondent under Section 64 BNSS and conclude the inquiry as expeditiously as possible within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of

receipt of copy of this order

6. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No

costs.

23.03.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No

gbg

To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District,

Madurai.

2.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by The Inspector of Police,

Alanganallur Police Station, Madurai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai.

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/04/2026 05:09:42 pm )

##PAGE4##

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1550 of 2026

L.VICTORIA GOWRI,J

gbg

W.P.Crl(MD)No.1550 of 2026

23.03.2026

4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/04/2026 05:09:42 pm )

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top