IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED WA No. 262 of 2026 AND CMP NO. 2416 OF 2026

1. The Registrar Tamil Nadu Agriculture University, Coimbatore 641003.

2. The Controller Tamil Nadu Agriculture University, Coimbatore 641003.

..Appellants Vs

1. J.Krishnamoorthy S/o. Late. Jevena Gowder D.No. 9/10, Nanjandu Village and Post Udagamandalam, The Nilgiris.

2. The Secretary to Government Department of Agricultural Fort St.George Chennai 09.

..Respondents Prayer : Writ Appeal under Clause XV of the Letters Patent to set aside the order dated 23.08.2023 made in W.P. No. 20891 of 2019 and consequently dismiss the W.P. No. 20891 of 2019.

For Appellants : Mr.C. Prakasam For Respondents : Mr.S.John J.Raja Singh Additional Government Pleader – for R2

Judgment

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.Suresh Kumar J.)

This intra court appeal has been directed against the order passed by the Writ Court dated 23.08.2023 made in W.P.No.20891 of 2019.

2. The respondent viz., J.Krishnamoorthy was engaged as a Mazdoor and was appointed on daily wage basis in the year 1988 by the appellant University. In that capacity, he has been working without any break for several years. In order to regularise the services of these kind of employees, who had been appointed as non-provincialised service, consolidated pay, honorarium or daily wage basis, the Government thought it fit to issue a Government Order. Accordingly G.O.(Ms) No.408, Finance Department dated 25.08.2009 was issued, whereby one of the imports was to regularise the services of these kind of four categories of employees and after regularising their services, while calculating the total pensionable period for last drawn pay of those employees, whether the services rendered by them during their service as non-provincialised service, consolidated pay, honorarium or daily wage basis can also be taken into account or not and this was also inserted in the said Government Order. Based on the said Government Order, in various Government Departments, those four categories of employees who had initially been appointed on temporary basis have subsequently been regularised, and while retiring from service on the basis of the last drawn pay their total pensionable service has been calculated taking into account 50% of the service rendered in any of the four categories such as non-provincialised service, consolidated pay, honorarium or daily wage along with the remaining service and accordingly their pension was calculated and paid to those employees.

3. When this being the position, the import of G.O.Ms.No.408 dated

25.08.2009 whether can be made applicable to the employees of those four categories employed at the appellant University or not was the question that arose, where, the University passed a resolution adopting the Government Order only in respect of three categories of employees ie., non-provincialised service, consolidated pay, and honorarium, but not for daily wage employees. While so, one of such employees who is no more seems to have approached this Court seeking the benefit of the said Government Order to the daily wage employees who worked in the appellant University, by filing W.P.No.13040 of 2016. The said writ petition was considered and decided by this Court in the matter of V.Srinivasan (deceased) and others Vs. The Controller, Tamil Nadu Agriculture University, Coimbatore and Others.

4. In the said judgment, a detailed order has been passed by the writ court, whereby it was held that the 4^th category ie., daily wage employees were also entitled to calculate 50% of their past service before regularisation as part of total pensionable service for the purpose of calculating their pension.

5. Though it is claimed by the learned counsel for the appellant University that, as against the said order an intra court appeal has been filed, it is in the SR stage belatedly, where, there has been a delay i