Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.KUMARAPPAN, J
V.Balasubramanian – Appellant
Versus
K.Anbalagan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. signatures on blank papers alleged misused for trust partnership claim. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. magistrate may order further police investigation per crpc 202. (Para 3 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. parties contend on procedure for handling protest petitions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. revisional jurisdiction limited to patent errors or perversity. (Para 11) |
| 5. no illegality in order; revision dismissed for lack of merits. (Para 12 , 13) |
ORDER
The present Criminal Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Mannargudi, in R.C.S.No.1 of 2025, dated 22.08.2025.
2. The brief facts which are necessary for disposal of the present revision are that, the first respondent/de facto complainant is one of the Trustees of Bharathidasan Educational Culture and Social Welfare Trust. His wife, Vanaja, brother-in-law Ashokan, are also Trustees of the said institution. According to the prosecution, the first petitioner, on 15.07.2018, had obtained signatures of the first respondent and his family members on blank papers. It is alleged that, the first petitioner induced the first respondent to sign the said documents, and had assured that the sale deed woul
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
