SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 36947

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V.Karthikeyan, K.Rajasekar, JJ
K.Viswanathan – Appellant
Versus
S.K.Devakumar – Respondent
AS No. 396 of 2018



Advocates:
For Appellant: Mr.R.Agilesh
For Respondents: Mr.M.R.Jothimanian for R3 to R5

Court permitted withdrawal of appeal upon counsel's endorsement, dismissing it without costs.

Headnote:First Paragraph: The appeal was filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of CPC challenging the judgment and preliminary decree dated 15.11.2017 in OS.No.42 of 2014. Essential facts involve the appellant seeking to withdraw the appeal with court permission. The court recorded the endorsement and dismissed the appeal. Second Paragraph: No specific issues were framed as the matter was resolved by withdrawal request. The court's reasoning was straightforward acceptance of the appellant's endorsement for withdrawal. Last Paragraph: The appeal suit is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by C.V.Karthikeyan J.)

The learned counsel for the appellant sought permission of the Court to withdraw the appeal suit. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case.

2. Recording the endorsement, the appeal suit is dismissed as withdrawn.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top