Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
R.Devasena – Appellant
Versus
Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Rep. by its Principal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges advance fee collection practices. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner seeks direction on unanswered representation. (Para 2) |
| 3. court directs consideration without merits opinion. (Para 3) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI R.Devasena ... Petitioner Vs.
1.Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Rep. by its Principal, NH-45, Trichy – Chennai Highways, Siruvachur Post, Perambalur District, Tamil Nadu – 621 113.
2.The Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R.Medical University, Rep. by its Registrar, 69, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.
3.University Grants Commission (UGC), Rep. by its The Secretary / Chairman, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi – 110 002. ... Respondents Prayer:
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to take action against 1st respondent for their practice of collecting advance fee for the upcoming Academic year and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to refund the petitioner’s advance amount with 18%
interest per annum considering the petitioners representation dated 05.12.2025 and the 1st
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
