Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
S.Vennila – Appellant
Versus
The Additional Principal Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks mandamus for representation consideration (Para 2) |
| 2. counsel requests direction for expeditious review (Para 3) |
| 3. court directs merits consideration and disposes petition (Para 4) |
O R D E R
By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2.The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 26.04.2025 for allotment of tenement in the Pattinapakkam Scheme.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner made representation dated 26.04.2025 to the respondents seeking allotment of tenement in the Pattinapakkam Scheme, however, there is no response. Hence, this Court may without going into the merits of the case, issue direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.04.2025 and to pass appropriate orders, within a reasonable time frame.
4.Considering the limited relief now sought for by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the second resp
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
