SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 37074

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J
S.Sakthivel – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.T.Leninkumar
For the Respondents:Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar (R3), Government Advocate (Crl.), Mr.M.Muthumanikkam (R1 & R2), Government Advocate (Civil)

Court directs police enquiry under S.64 BNSS and peace committee for resolving temple festival disputes amid rival claims.

Headnote:Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to permit a temple festival and provide police protection, citing representations dated 08.04.2026 and 16.04.2026. The court noted rival parties' presence and materials submitted. The court directed procedural resolution without adverse orders against the private respondent. The court considered submissions from counsel and perused materials, dispensing notice to the private respondent. The key issue was permission for the festival amid rival claims. The ratio involves directing police enquiry under S.64 BNSS, followed by tahsildar peace committee if needed, to facilitate the event. The writ petition is disposed with directions to complete the exercise within one week.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks mandamus for temple festival permission and protection. (Para 1)
2. rival parties present regarding festival issue. (Para 2)
3. police enquiry and peace committee to resolve festival conduct. (Para 3 , 4)

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the 2nd and 3rd respondents to permit the villagers to conduct the temple festival of Arulmighu Shri Muthumariamman Kovil, Srirangam Taluk, Trichy District, scheduled on 20.05.2026 and also provide adequate police protection for conducting the temple festival by considering the petitioner's representations dated 08.04.2026 and 16.04.2026.

2. The learned Government Advocate drew my attention to the presence of rival parties with regard to the subject issue.

3. Heard the learned counsel on either sides and carefully perused the materials placed before this Court. Since no adverse order is proposed to be passed against the private respondent, notice to him is dispensed with.

4. In view of the above, the third respondent police is directed to issue notice to the petitioner and the fourth respondent under Section 64 of the BNSS, conduct an enquiry, and thereafter, if a consensus is not arrived at, forward the matter to the second respondent. On receipt of the same, the second respondent is directed to convene a peace committee meeting and resolve the issues, and facilitate the conduct of the temple festival as scheduled on 20.05.2026. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. This writ petition is disposed with the above directions.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top