Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J
Rajagopal – Appellant
Versus
R.Manickam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges dismissal of recall and expert exam in cheque case. (Para 2) |
| 2. alleged ink variation and misuse of blank cheque. (Para 3) |
| 3. presumptions under ni act sections 20,118,139; petition dilatory, dismissed. (Para 4 , 5) |
ORDER
This Criminal Original petition is filed challenging the order passed in Crl.R.No.6 of 2025 dated 28.01.2026 passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
2. The petitioner is an accused in a case filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in S.C.No.927 of 2023 filed by the respondent/complainant. The petitioner filed Crl.MP.Nos.965 and 967 of 2025 before the Trial Court seeking to recall PW1 for further cross-examination and to send the cheque Ex.B1 to handwriting expert to find out the difference in the ink and alterations made in it. The Trial Court by order dated 11.07.2025 dismissed the petitions. Challenging the same, the petitioner preferred a revision in Crl.R.No.6 of 2025 and the District Judge by order dated 28.01.2026 dismissed the revision. Aggrieved by the same, the present petition has been filed.
3. The contention of the petitioner is that in Ex.B1 cheque, that there is variation in
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
