Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Sounthar, J
Jayarama Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Suseelamma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. second appeal with delay condonation petition filed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appellant's delay explanation via counsel inadvertence and illness. (Para 3) |
| 3. delay not condoned due to discrepancies; appeal rejected. (Para 5 , 6) |
PRAYER : Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., to set aside the common judgment and decree dated 22.02.2017 made in A.S.No.26 of 2014 on the file of the Court of the Additional District Judge, Hosur, which was in the nature of reversing the judgment and decree dated 21.12.2012 made in O.S.No.176 of
2010 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Hosur.
For Appellant(s): Mr.C.Parthiban
ORDER
The Second Appeal has been filed to set aside the common judgment and decree dated 22.02.2017 made in A.S.No.26 of 2014 on the file of the Court of the Additional District Judge, Hosur, reversing the judgment and decree dated 21.12.2012 made in O.S.No.176 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Hosur.
2. The Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to condone the delay of 3155 days in filing the above Second Appeal.
3. In the affidavit filed in support of the condone delay petition, it was stated by the petitioner / appellant that he entrust
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
