SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 37182

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J
R.Sivanesan Nadar – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Thoothukudi District – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr.G.Thiruvarutselvan
For Respondents:Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar (R2 & R5), Government Advocate (Crl.), Mr.C.Satheesh (R1, R3 & R4), Government Advocate (Civil)

Police must prevent excommunication, ensure temple access and customary participation through enquiry under BNSS.

Headnote:Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing authorities to act against private respondents for excommunication by denying collection of 'Vari (Tax)' and temple access. The court noted receipt of the petitioner's representation by police. The court directed police to issue summons under Section 64 of BNSS, conduct enquiry expeditiously, facilitate tax acceptance, and ensure no exclusion from temple festivals or poojas. The core issue was enforcement of action against community excommunication denying temple rights. The ratio decidendi emphasized police intervention to prevent exclusion from customary temple practices and ensure participation rights. The writ petition stands disposed of with directions to conclude enquiry by 29.04.2026.

Table of Content
1. petition against excommunication denying temple rights. (Para 1)
2. police received representation; notice dispensed. (Para 2 , 3)
3. direct summons, enquiry, ensure temple participation. (Para 4)

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeing for a direction to the 1st to 5th respondents to take action against the 6th to 10th respondents for committing excommunication by refusing to collect 'Vari (Tax)' and restraining the petitioner and his family members to enter, worship, conduct pooja and participate in the temple festivals of Sri Muthuramman Temple situated at Veerappa Nadar Kudiruppu, Tiruchendur Taluk, Thoothukudi District on the basis of his representation dated 30.03.2026.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent police submitted that the fifth respondent police has received the representation from the petitioner.

3. Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the material available on record. Since no adverse order is proposed to be passed against the private respondents, notice to them is dispensed with.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the fifth respondent is directed to issue summons to the petitioner as well as the private respondents herein under Section 64 of the BNSS and to conclude the enquiry as expeditiously as possible, preferably on or before 29.04.2026. The fifth respondent shall also facilitate the private respondents in accepting kudiwari from the petitioner and take necessary steps to ensure the petitioner’s participation in the temple festival. It is made clear that none of the persons, including the petitioner, shall be excluded or excommunicated from participating in the temple festival and other poojas and customary practices relating to the subject temple.

5. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top