SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 37236

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V. Karthikeyan, K. Rajasekar, JJ
M.P. Shanthi @ Sangeetha – Appellant
Versus
P.Pukraj – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: No appearance
For the Respondents: Mr.D.Shivakumaran for R1 to R7 R19 & R9, Mr.D.Shivakumaran for R7 to R15

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by C.V.Karthikeyan J.)

The matters had been listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. The learned counsel for the appellant is not present. In the earlier occasion also the counsel for the appellant is not present.

2.The appeals stand dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top