SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 37241

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender, JJ
R.Radha – Appellant
Versus
Poongodi – Respondent
Cont.P.No.3275 of 2024



Important Points

Contempt petition closed upon respondents' submission of compliance with court order.

Subject

Contempt - Civil Contempt

Act Referred

Headnote

First Paragraph: The contempt petition arises under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act for wilful disobedience of the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in W.P.No.33781 of 2019. Essential facts involve the petitioner's allegation of non-compliance by respondents, including public officials and a deemed university. The court recorded submission of compliance, leading to closure of proceedings. Second Paragraph: The sole issue framed was whether respondents wilfully disobeyed the prior order. The court's reasoning accepted the respondents' submission of compliance without further inquiry, disposing the matter. Third Paragraph: This contempt petition stands closed.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S.T.Bharath Gowtham
For the Respondents: D.Ravichander, N.Jothi, S.Vinod

Table of Content
1. alleged wilful disobedience of prior court order. (Para 1)
2. compliance submitted; petition closed. (Para 2 , 3)

O R D E R

[Made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J., This contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order dated 27.01.2022 in W.P.No.33781 of 2019.

2. Today, when the contempt petition was taken up for hearing, learned Special Government Pleader, appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the order of this Court has been complied with.

3. Recording the said submission, this contempt petition stands closed.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top