Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Dhandapani, J
N.Usha – Appellant
Versus
Managing Director Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's ews application and prior court direction ignored. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties submit on eligibility, availability, and payment requirement. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court acknowledges eligibility and directs time-bound allotment. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. specific payment and allotment directions issued. (Para 10) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 19.01.2026 for allotment of a house under the schemes of the Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board.
2. It is the case of the petitioner, that she belongs to the Economically Weaker Section and applied for allotment of a tenement under the Thirumangalam Project, Chennai on 05.01.2023. It is further stated that though the petitioner satisfied all eligibility criteria, no allotment was made, compelling the petitioner to file W.P.No.2930 of 2023 before this Court.
3. Subsequently, based on information obtained under the RTI Act, the petitioner came to know that tenements were available under the Shenoy Nagar Project and submitted a representation dated 03.05.2024 seeking allotment therein. By a common order dated 11.06.2024 in W.P. No.2930 o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
