Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
B.Balamurugan – Appellant
Versus
Secretary to Government – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges notice and sealing of property. (Para 1) |
| 2. appeal filed; govt. directed rectification. (Para 2) |
| 3. delay due to hospitalization; seeks extension. (Para 3) |
| 4. extension granted; de-seal pending compliance. (Para 4) |
(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)
The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition challenging the impugned notice dated 17.03.2026 and seeking a direction to the respondents to remove the lock and seal from the petitioner’s property. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners fairly submitted that the petitioner had already preferred an appeal before the Government against the action initiated by the Corporation. In the said appeal, the Government, by order dated 09.12.2025, passed the following directions:
“(i) Petitioners shall obtain demolition approved plan from Madurai Corporation showing the rectification if any proposed to make the construction as per rules in force along with the structural stability report.
(ii) The Madurai Corporation shall approve the demolition plan within 10 days from the date of application.
(iii) The petitioners shall carry out rectification as per the approved demolition plan or obtain
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
