Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J
Patchaimuthu – Appellant
Versus
Arumugam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prayer for expeditious disposal of pending appeal due to delay. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. inquiry into missing records and reconstruction process. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. directions for record reconstruction and appeal disposal by deadlines. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER
This revision seeks for expeditious disposal of A.S.No.66 of 2014 pending on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge at Sivagangai.
2. By an order dated 02.04.2026, I requested the learned Subordinate Judge to send a report as to why an appeal of the year 2014 is still kept pending. The learned Subordinate Judge sent a report dated 10.04.2026, stating that the original of the judgment and decree in O.S.No.130 of 2010 dated 10.01.2014, on the file of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate at Thiruppathur, had been misplaced by the said Court. He assured that after getting the original decree and judgment in O.S.No.130 of 2010 from the learned Trial Judge, he will dispose of the appeal within a month from that date.
3. I was surprised that official records have gone missing. Hence, I requested the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruppathur, to state as to why the original records have gone missing
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
