SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 37633

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Hemant Chandangoudar, J
R.Muthuraj – Appellant
Versus
Registrar, Tamil Nadu Dr.Ambedkar Law University – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Maharaja
For the Respondents: Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss, Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam

University may permit LL.B. redo candidates to write exams under exceptional N+2+1 extension upon document submission.

Headnote:The petitioner sought permission under Article 226 to write arrears examinations for the five-year LL.B. course beyond the extended N+2 period as per University Regulations. Facts reveal the petitioner joined in 2018, required completion by 2025 with possible one-year extension in exceptional cases. Court noted the University's communication extending UGC N+2 to N+2+1, permitting redo candidates upon document submission. Issue framed as whether the petitioner, a redo candidate, qualifies for the one-time extension to write May 2026 exams. Ratio decidendi: University communication explicitly allows redo candidates to submit documents for permission, treated as merits-based exceptional circumstance without further scrutiny. Writ petition disposed, directing University to permit petitioner to write supplementary examination upon application submission. No costs.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for arrears exam permission under course regulations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. university extended n+2+1 period for redo candidates. (Para 4)
3. permit exam upon application submission. (Para 6)

ORDER

The petitioner seeks a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to permit him to write the examinations in respect of arrears in six papers in the ensuing examinations commencing from 08.05.2026 for the five-year LL.B. course.

2.The petitioner joined the five-year LL.B. course in 2018. As per the Regulations of the University, the petitioner was required to complete the course in the year 2025. The Regulations provide that ordinarily no student shall be granted time beyond the extended period of two years. However, in exceptional circumstances, and based on the merits of each case, the University may permit a student one additional year for completion of the programme.

3.The petitioner submitted an application to the University explaining the reasons for his inability to complete the course within the extended period, namely, by the year 2025.

4.The learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 2 placed on record a communication dated 28.04.2026 issued by Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University, wherein the UGC N+2 Uniform Span period has been extended by one year as N+2+1. In the said communication, certain batches of students have been permitted, as a one-time measure, to write the May 2026 examinations. The communication further states that the petitioner is a redo candidate and that, if he submits the necessary documents relevant to the redo of the course, the University would permit him to write the examination during May 2026.

5.The said communication is taken on record.

6.In light of the above, this writ petition is disposed of, permitting the petitioner to submit an application to redo of the course. Upon submission of the application, the University shall permit the petitioner to write the supplementary examination during May 2026. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top