Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
K.G.Somasundaram – Appellant
Versus
Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum rep by its Chairman-cum-Superintending Engineer, Tirupur Electricity Distribution Circle, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to consumer grievance forum order in writ petition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appeal remedy available, not exhausted by petitioner. (Para 3) |
| 3. petition dismissed for non-prosecution, no costs. (Para 4) |
O R D E R
Challenge in this Writ Petition was made against the order passed by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum of the respondents.
2.None appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
3.Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that against this order, appeal remedy is available and the petitioner, without exhausting the appeal provision, has approached this Court.
4.Though the appeal remedy is available and this Court is also not inclined to entertain this petition, since none appeared on behalf of the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
