Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.Swaminathan, R.Poornima, JJ
V.Palsamy – Appellant
Versus
Vijayalakshmi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. non-implementation excused by pending writ petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. direct enforcement post-dismissal; restoration undertaking. (Para 2) |
| 3. petition closed recording compliance undertaking. (Para 3) |
The respondents could not implement the order passed by this Court only in view of the pendency of W.P(MD)No.20696 of 2021. Since the said writ petition has been dismissed by us today, we direct the respondents to enforce the order of this Court forthwith and without any delay.
2.The learned Additional Government Pleader informs the Court that the crematorium will be removed and the road in question will be restored to its original position within three (3) weeks.
3.Recording the said undertaking, this Contempt Petition stands closed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
