IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.Dhandapani, J
Hindustan Stone Crusher – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks restraint on nearby crusher approvals (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. rule 36 limits layouts, not crushers (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. crusher not inhabited site; petition dismissed (Para 5 , 6) |
7.Deepa ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 1 to 5 not to accord any permission or approval to the respondents 6 and 7 or any other person for any development activity, including crusher unit to be erected in S.Nos.125/2B, 125/3, 125/1, 127/1, 127/2, 122/1B, 122/4, 121/2F, 121/6B, 121/6A, 121/2B and 121/2E within 300 meters from the petitioner’s quarry in S.No.35/3 of Eripudhur Village, Valapady Taluk, Salem District, by considering the petitioner’s representations dated 05.12.2025 and 12.01.2026.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.S,Senthil For Respondent(s): Mr.Stalin Abimanyu Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R5
O R D E R
This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 5 not to accord any permission or approval to the respondents 6 and 7 or any other person for any development activity including crusher unit to be erected in S.Nos.125/2B, 125/3, 125/1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.