IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
S.Kayalvizhi – Appellant
Versus
The District Registrar, Madurai District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's valid scheduled caste certificate previously confirmed. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. notice merely for inquiry appearance. (Para 4) |
| 3. direct petitioner to submit explanation for lawful inquiry. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER
This writ petition is filed challenging the impugned notice dated
13.04.2026.
2.Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the material records, the contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner belongs to the Scheduled Caste and a Community Certificate has been duly issued. On earlier occasion, since dispute was unnecessarily raised, enquiry was also conducted and the certificate was found to be valid and correct.
3.Under these circumstances, when the petitioner has raised certain allegations as against the 4th respondent now functioning as the third respondent, and this Court also having entertained the writ petition in WP(MD)No.9394 of 2026, now willfully and unwantedly, without any reason whatsoever, the impugned notice has been issued. The entire exercise is done only to curtail the livelihood of the petitioner and to raise unnecessary dispute and the litigation on the communal status of the petitioner. Therefore, the petition
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.