Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V. Karthikeyan, K. Kumaresh Babu, JJ
P.Saroja Bai – Appellant
Versus
K.Govardhana Prasad – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history of testamentary original suit. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. plaintiff claims valid will; defendant alleges fabrication. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. trial issues and evidence on will genuineness. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. trial court upholds will execution and probate. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. appeal arguments on suspicious circumstances and proof. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. framed issues: legal proof and suspicions rebuttal. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. attesting witness verifies will preparation and execution. (Para 26 , 27 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 8. will proved per statutory attestation requirements. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 9. no evidence supports alleged testator incapacity claims. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 10. suspicious circumstances unproven; precedents applied. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 11. original decree affirmed; appeal dismissed. (Para 56 , 57) |
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by C.V.Karthikeyan J.)
1.The 7th and 9th defendants, who are the legal representatives of the deceased 1st defendant in T.O.S.No.6 of 2011 on the file of the Original Side of this Court aggrieved by the judgmen
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
