Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.KUMARESH BABU, J
Babu @ A.Subramaniam – Appellant
Versus
R.Balasubramaniam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to eviction order in tenant proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 10) |
| 2. arguments on rent default, disuse, and delays. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. rent eviction invalid without payment direction. (Para 9) |
| 4. disuse eviction upheld per inspection report. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
ORDER
The present Revision has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 20.01.2022 made in O.P.No.26 of 1996 on the file of The Special Deputy Collector, Revenue Court, Trichy camp at Coimbatore.
2. Heard Mr.S.Karthikei Balan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ullasavelan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 9.
3. Mr.S.Karthikei Balan, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondents predecessor in interest are the owners of the land which was taken on lease by the petitioner’s father and his brothers against whom the petition for eviction under the Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act was preferred. He would submit that during the pendency of the proceedings, the original lessee namely his paternal uncle and his father who was cultivating the lands along with them had died. Similarly, some of the legal heirs of the deceased
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
