Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.KUMARESH BABU, J
M.Chellappan – Appellant
Versus
S.Santhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging trial court impleadment order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners argue improper third-party impleadment under o.i r.10(2). (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. respondents justify impleadment as successors protecting possession rights. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. suit for bare injunction; pendente lite purchase issue not central. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. application defective; use o.xxii r.10 for assignment continuance. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. revision allowed; impleadment order set aside. (Para 18) |
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order and decreetal order made in IA.No.732 of 2021 dated 23.10.2021 in O.S.No.206/2019 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court at Alandur.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Jothi Senior Counsel For Mr.S.Vinod For Respondent(s): Mr. M. Thangadurai (For RR2, 4 and 5)
For R1 - Died For RR3, R6 and R7 – No appearance
ORDER
The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the order and decreetal order made in IA.No.732 of 2021 dated 23.10.2021 in O.S.No.206 of 2019 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court at Alandur.
2. Heard Mr.N.Jothi, learned Senior Coun
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
