IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, CJ, G.Arul Murugan, J
Nusrath Abidha – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner and Secretary to Government – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks direction for timely appeal disposal under s.80-a. (Para 2) |
| 2. similar directions issued: decide stay in 3 weeks, no coercion. (Para 4 , 5) |
Heard.
2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to the first respondent to dispose of the appeal/revision petition filed under Section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 against the notice dated 2.3.2026 issued by respondent Nos.3 and 4.
3. This Court, vide order dated 18.08.2025 in W.P.No.31046 of
2025 (D.Ezhil Maran vs. The Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Dept), had dealt with similar prayer and disposed of the said writ petition with the following observations and directions:
“3. This Court is flooded with similar cases where revision petitions are being filed along with stay applications and due to delay in considering the prayer for stay, proceedings are being drawn for lock and seal of the premises.
4. Where a revision petition is filed along with an application for stay, the revisional authority must decide the application for stay within a period of three weeks from the date of filing of the stay a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.