IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, CJ, G.Arul Murugan, J
A.Senthilkumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
W.P.No.17732 of 2026|W.M.P.Nos.19057 and 19058 of 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. pending appeal under section 80a(3) against prior notice. (Para 2 , 3 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. petitioner to appeal impugned lock and seal order. (Para 4 , 8) |
| 3. consolidate appeals, stay enforcement till disposal. (Para 5 , 9 , 10) |
Heard.
2. This writ petition assails the impugned lock and seal notice dated 20.3.2026 and the impugned lock and seal order dated 17.4.2026 on the ground that when already appeal preferred under Section 80A(3) of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 (for short, “the Act”) is pending, the impugned lock and seal notice and lock and seal order came to be issued.
3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner contended that already the respondent Municipality has issued notice dated 2.9.2024, against which the petitioner has filed an appeal under Section 80A(3) of the Act. Further, the petitioner had also approached this Court earlier by filing W.P.No.22824 of 2025, wherein a direction was issued by this Court on 24.6.2025 to the first respondent therein to dispose of the appeal filed under Section 80A(3) of the Act within a period of three months. It is submitted that while the said appeal is still pending consideration, the third respondent has issued the impugned notice and order, which are not sustainable in law.
4. Learned State Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 contended that, in fact, the appeal filed earlier has already been taken up for hearing and the petitioner has not cooperated in the enquiry and, therefore, the appeal proceedings could not be completed within three months as directed by this Court earlier. He would submit that, as against the present impugned lock and seal order, which was issued for locking and sealing of the premises, there is a provision for filing an appeal and the petitioner may be relegated to file appeal.
5. We have considered the rival submissions and also perused the materials on record.
6. Admittedly, based on the steps initiated by the owner of the premises, earlier, a notice was issued calling for the approved plan/stop work on 2.9.2024. The petitioner had filed appeal under Section 80A(3) of the Act before the appellate authority and since the appeal was not decided, a writ petition, being W.P.No.22824 of 2025, came to be filed by the petitioner and, this Court, by the order dated
24.6.2025, held thus:
“Mr.M.Venkateswaran, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the 1st & 2nd respondents. Mr.B.Anand, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the 3rd respondent. By consider of both sides, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. This Writ Petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to consider and dispose of the stay application in the Special Revision Petition filed under Section 80A(3) of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, by the petitioner on
29.11.2024 on the file of the first respondent.
3. (i) The case of the petitioner is that he is owner of the property located at No.4, Town Survey ward No.E, T.S.No.153/1A Part of Bharathi Road, Pollachi, Coimbatore District. The above said property along with larger extent of lands originally belonged to his grandfather and subsequently, by way of Deed of Family Arrangement dated 29.09.2006, a portion of the said property was allotted to his father P.N.Arumugam and his brother N.Chandrasekaran and subsequently, through WILL and registered Settlement deed, part of the property consisting of land with building in the sub-divided survey No.153/1 was given to the petitioner. The building was constructed during the year
1962 and it is in existence for more than 60 years.
(ii) A third party seems to have filed a Public Interest litigation in W.P.No.227 of 2024 before this Court to remove the unauthorized construction and encroachments in Pollachi Municipality and this Court closed the said writ petition with certain direction. The 3rd respondent issued notice and the petitioner appeared wi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.