SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 37959

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J
Kumar – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.E.Balasubramanian
For the Respondents:Mr.M.Muthumanikkam (R1 & R2), Government Advocate (Civil), Mr.S.S.Manoj (R3 to R5), Government Advocate (Crl.)

Court directs peace committee meeting to ensure temple tax payment and festival participation rights.

Headnote:Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing authorities to convene a peace committee meeting to enable payment of temple tax and participation in the Chithra Pournami Festival. The facts involve the sixth respondent preventing the petitioner and 24 families from paying tax and participating in the 11th Mandakapadi at Arulmigu Sri Kaliamman Temple. The court found the relief limited and dispensed notice to the sixth respondent, directing facilitation of tax payment and festival participation. The primary issue was whether to direct the second respondent to hold a peace committee meeting based on the petitioner's representation dated 17.04.2026. The court's reasoning emphasized the limited scope of relief, ensuring no obstruction to tax payment or festival participation, promoting communal harmony. The writ petition stands disposed of with directions to convene the peace committee meeting and facilitate tax payment and participation.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks mandamus for peace meeting to enable tax payment and festival participation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court hears arguments and reviews materials, dispenses notice. (Para 3)
3. directs peace committee and prohibits refusal of tax or participation. (Para 4)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the second respondent to convene and conduct a peace committee meeting within a time frame to be fixed by this Court, so as to ensure that the petitioner and 24 families are permitted to pay the tax and participate in the 11th Mandakapadi of the Chithra Pournami Festival held on 30.04.2026, in connection with Arulmigu Sri Kaliamman Temple, based on the petitioner’s representation dated

17.04.2026.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the sixth respondent is preventing the petitioner and 24 other families from paying the temple tax, refusing to accept the same, and also from participating in the 11th Mandakapadi of the aforesaid temple, and hence sought the indulgence of this Court.

3. Heard the learned counsel on either sides and carefully perused the materials placed before this Court. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed in this writ petition, notice to the sixth respondent is dispensed with.

4. Considering the limited scope of the relief sought, the second respondent is directed to convene a peace committee meeting, after issuing notice to the petitioner as well as the sixth respondent, and to facilitate the petitioner and 24 families in paying the temple tax. It is made clear that the sixth respondent shall not refuse to receive the same from the petitioner or any other person willing to pay the temple tax, and no one shall be prevented from participating in the temple festival.

5. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top