SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 38107

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Hemant Chandangoudar, J
Balammal – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.I.Muthiah
For the Respondents: Mr.S.S.Madhavan

Mandamus directs enforcement of senior citizen maintenance order under the Act upon default.

Headnote:Under Section 11 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, the Maintenance Tribunal ordered the son to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.5,000/- to the petitioner mother. The son defaulted after two months, causing financial hardship despite representations. The court directed enforcement. Issue: Whether the authorities must implement the Tribunal's maintenance order under the Act. Ratio: Wilful default in maintenance payment necessitates prompt enforcement action by the Revenue Divisional Officer to ensure compliance and welfare. Writ petition disposed with direction to implement the order dated 04.08.2025 within two months from receipt of this order.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks enforcement of defaulted maintenance order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. government pleader assures implementation within two months. (Para 4)
3. writ disposed directing order enforcement without costs. (Para 5)

O R D E R

Heard Mr. S.I. Muthiah, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr.

S.S. Madhavan, learned Additional Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2.

2.The petitioner has approached this Court seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to implement the order dated 04.08.2025 passed under Section 11 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.

3.By the said order, the third respondent, who is the son of the petitioner, was directed to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.5,000/-. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the third respondent paid maintenance only for two months and has thereafter wilfully defaulted in complying with the order, thereby causing financial hardship and mental distress to the petitioner. Despite repeated representations, no effective steps have been taken by the respondents to enforce the said order.

4.Mr. S.S. Madhavan, learned Additional Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that necessary steps will be taken to implement the order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The said submission is taken on record.

5.In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to take appropriate steps to implement the order dated 04.08.2025 in Na.Ka. No. 3110/2025/A1 within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top