SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 38246

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Hemant Chandangoudar, J
Selvan Jebaraj – Appellant
Versus
Regional Passport Officer – Respondent
Writ Petition|File No.MD8076653079426|C.C. No.247 of 2023|C.C. No.1637 of 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.P.Selvakumar
For the Respondents: Mr.M.Gajendran, Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi

Passport renewal not to be refused outright during pending criminal cases if NOC and undertaking provided per guidelines.

Headnote:The Passport Act, 1967, particularly Section 6(2)(f), empowers the Passport Authority to refuse issuance of a passport if criminal proceedings are pending against the applicant before a criminal court in India. The petitioner sought renewal of passport despite pending criminal cases under Sections 406, 420, 468, 471, 120-B r/w 34 IPC in C.C. Nos. 247/2023 and 1637/2023. The court found that while refusal is permissible, absolute denial without considering relief guidelines is unjustified. Guidelines under G.S.R. 570(E) allow issuance with No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the court and undertaking. Issues framed include whether Passport Authority can refuse renewal solely on pendency of criminal cases, and applicability of statutory guidelines for relief. The court reasoned that Passport Rules permit restricted validity passports during pendency, and authorities must follow notification procedures rather than outright refusal. The writ petition is disposed with directions for petitioner to obtain NOC and undertaking affidavit, enabling temporary passport renewal upon compliance.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's passport renewal denied due to pending criminal cases. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. s.6(2)(f) permits refusal for pending proceedings. (Para 4 , 5)
3. guidelines allow noc and restricted passport issuance. (Para 6)
4. directions issued for noc, undertaking, temporary renewal. (Para 8)

O R D E R

The petitioner, aggrieved by the non-consideration of his application for renewal of passport by the first respondent, has filed this writ petition.

2.Mr. M. Gajendran, learned Standing Counsel, who takes notice for the first respondent, submitted that based on an adverse report received from the second respondent, the petitioner’s application has not been considered.

3.Mr. M. Vaikkam Karunanithi, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), who takes notice for the second respondent, submitted that two criminal cases are pending against the petitioner, namely:

(i) C.C. No.247 of 2023, for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 IPC @ Sections 406, 420, 468, 471, 120-B r/w 34 IPC; and (ii) C.C. No.1637 of 2023, for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC r/w 34 IPC, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.IV, Tuticorin.

4.The Passport Authority can refuse issuance of a passport or any travel document under Section 6 of the Passports Act, 1967. Section 6(2)

(f) of the Act is relevant and is extracted hereunder:

“6. Refusal of passports, travel documents, etc.—

(2) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, the passport authority shall refuse to issue a passport or travel document for visiting any foreign country under clause (c) of sub-section (2) of Section 5 on any one or more of the following grounds, and on no other ground, namely—

(f) that proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by the applicant are pending before a Criminal Court in India.”

5.The above provision enables the Passport Authority to refuse issuance of a passport or travel document to an applicant on the ground that criminal proceedings are pending before a Criminal Court in India.

6.The Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, has issued a statutory notification in G.S.R. 570(E), dated 25.08.1993, prescribing certain guidelines to provide relief to applicants against whom criminal proceedings are pending. Such applicants may obtain a passport by securing a No Objection Certificate from the concerned Court and by filing an undertaking as prescribed in the notification. 7.Ordinarily, under Rule 12 of the Passport Rules, the validity of a passport is for a period of ten years. However, where the applicant is facing criminal proceedings, the passport may be issued with a restricted validity period. Therefore, the Passport Authority is not justified in refusing to decide the petitioner’s application for renewal of passport solely on the ground of pendency of criminal cases.

8.Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

(i) The petitioner shall file an affidavit of undertaking along with substantive sureties before the concerned Court where the criminal cases are pending, to ensure his availability for trial. Upon satisfaction and after ensuring his availability for trial, the concerned Court shall issue a No Objection Certificate enabling the petitioner to get his passport renewed.

(ii) Thereafter, the petitioner shall file an affidavit under G.S.R.

570(E), along with the No Objection Certificate obtained from the concerned Court, before the Passport Authority. Upon such presentation, the Passport Authority shall consider the same and renew the passport for a temporary period depending upon the requirement.

9.There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top