IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
Jeyam Agency Represented by its Proprietor M. Jeyakumar – Appellant
Versus
Deputy State Tax Officer-2 Tenkasi Assessment Circle – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fresh hearing granted on deposit condition (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. ex parte gst assessment due to non-participation (Para 3) |
| 3. impugned order set aside with remand terms (Para 5) |
ORDER
This writ petition challenges the impugned order dated 17.12.2025 which is an assessment order passed underSection 73of theTNGST Act 2017.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader representing the revenue.
3. By the impugned order, the assessment was made ex parte because the petitioner did not utilise the opportunities provided. The discrepancies and grounds on which the assessment order was issued, the dealer’s explanation on merits, and the reasons for not participating in the assessment proceedings are summarized briefly and presented in a table below:
4. Considering the nature of the discrepancies noted, the explanation provided by the assessee and the reason given before this Court for not availing the opportunity, I believe that an opportunity can be granted to the assessee to present their submissions and produce the relevant supporting documents before the respondent assessing officer. This Court has been extending such opport
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.