Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, J
Elumalai – Appellant
Versus
State Rep.By Inspector Of Police, Valasaravakkam Police Station – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prosecution alleges abuse and threats by petitioner. (Para 2) |
| 2. parties argue property dispute and investigation status. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. fir discloses prima facie cognizable offences. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. quashing limited; investigation must proceed per precedents. (Para 8) |
| 5. petition dismissed; expedite investigation. (Para 9) |
ORDER
This petition has been filed to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.72 of 2022 registered by the first respondent police for alleged offences under Sections 294(b) 354 and 506(1) of, as against the petitioner.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 04.05.2022, the defacto complainant preferred a complaint against the petitioner indicating that the petitioner, who is the brother of her husband, after demise of her father-in-law, abused the defacto complainant by showing private parts and threatened her with dire consequences.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the property in which the defacto complainant is residing, belongs to the petitioner also, in fact, the petitioner’s father-in-law is the absolute owner of the property, however, the 2nd respondent is attempting to grab the property, when the same was questi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
