Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
C.Petchimuthu – Appellant
Versus
Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar, Keezhur, Tuticorin District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to refusal based on prior agreement and missing original. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. section 34-c requires original or non-traceable certificate. (Para 4) |
| 3. prior agreement not grounds for sub-registrar refusal. (Para 6) |
ORDER
The Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned refusal check slip dated 10.03.2026.
2. The petitioner presented a sale agreement. The same is now refused to be registered on two grounds. Firstly, it is stated that there is a prior sale agreement, which remains pending and it has not been cancelled. The second reason that is mentioned is that the petitioner has not produced the original of the parent document relied upon by the petitioner.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that both the reasons are unsustainable.
4. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent would submit that in view of Section 34-C of the Registration (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 2025, without production of the original document or non-traceable certificate, the registration cannot be effected. 5. I have considered the rival submissions made on either side and perused the material records of the case.
6. As far as the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
