Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 38575
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Dr.K.Madhuram – Appellant
Versus
Reserve Bank of India – Respondent
W.P.No.961 of 2023|W.P.No.965 of 2023
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.H.Rajasekar
For the Respondents: No Appearance, Mr.L.Sai Prashanth, M/s.S.Sachin Priya Daniel
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.H.Rajasekar
For the Respondents: No Appearance, Mr.L.Sai Prashanth, M/s.S.Sachin Priya Daniel
Petitioner's withdrawal request permitted; writ petitions dismissed without costs.
Headnote:The petitioner filed writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking mandamus to direct consideration of representations against banks for loan account closures and amendments to credit reports. Court noted the factual context of loan disputes with banks and credit agency. No findings rendered due to withdrawal request. Issues pertained to regulatory action by Reserve Bank and bank compliance with credit reporting. No ratio decidendi established as matter withdrawn at hearing. Writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition withdrawn with court permission. (Para 1 , 2) |
COMMON ORDER
Today, when these writ petitions were taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for Petitioner sought the permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petitions and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petitions.
2. In view of the request coupled with an endorsement made by the learned counsel for Petitioner, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
No costs.
