Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar, J
G.Krishnan – Appellant
Versus
Secretary to Government, Revenue and Disaster Management Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners' service history as thalayari and village assistants detailed. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. prior division bench ruling covers pension claim; respondents concede. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. direct revised pension proposals within six weeks. (Para 6) |
COMMON ORDER
Heard Mr.S.Visvalingam, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.S.Shaji Bino, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
2. With the consent of both sides, the Writ Petitions are disposed of at the admission stage itself.
3. It is the case of the petitioners that they were initially appointed as Thalayari and served as such from 21.10.1988 to 31.05.1995 and 09.12.1985 to 31.05.1995 respectively. Thereafter, they were absorbed in the regular time scale of pay as Village Assistant with effect from 01.06.1995 in terms of G.O.(Perm) No.625, Revenue Department, dated 06.07.1995 and continued as such till 16.10.2018 and 17.10.2018 respectively. Thereafter, the petitioners were promoted as Village Administrative Officer through proceedings dated 16.10.2018 and 17.10.2018 respectively. Subsequently, the petitioners attained the age of superannuation and retired from service on 30.11.2018 and 31.03.2019 r
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
