Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
K.Sheik Dawood – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Waqf Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prior waqf board exoneration and court closure. (Para 2) |
| 2. rival contentions on stale vs new allegations. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. ceo order non-binding; board must hear afresh. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. writ disposed; documents to be furnished. (Para 8) |
ORDER
This writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 02.04.2026 and to quash the same.
2.Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the material records of the case, the case of the petitioner is that the private respondent herein earlier had made a complaint as against the petitioner and the other committee members. The matter ultimately was decided by the Waqf Board pursuant to the direction of this Court by hearing both sides and the allegations were found to be incorrect and accordingly, the committee was also recognized and they are continuing. As a matter of fact, the third respondent repeatedly tried to raise the very same allegation in the subsequent writ petitions and the contempt proceedings. The fact that earlier itself the entire issue has been dealt with and closed. In spite of the same, once again, the 3rd respondent seemed to have filed yet another writ petition. After all, the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
