Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.Srimathy, J
N.Venkatesubramanian – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges dro order on survey discrepancy in gifted temple land. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. remittal futile; directs civil court remedy. (Para 3) |
| 3. revenue authorities lack title adjudication jurisdiction. (Para 4) |
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceeding issued by the 2nd respondent vide his proceeding in Pa.Mu.Pi4/28795/2019 dated 10.02.2021 to quash the same and further to direct the 2nd respondent herein to pass orders afresh by hearing all the necessary parties by issuing notices to them and by perusing the revenue records available in his office.
ORDER
The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the impugned proceeding issued by the 2nd respondent vide his proceeding in Pa.Mu.Pi4/28795/2019 dated 10.02.2021 and further to direct the 2nd respondent herein to pass orders afresh by hearing all the necessary parties by issuing notices to them and by perusing the revenue records available in his office.
2.The brief facts are that the property in old Survey No.158/1 and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
