Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V. Karthikeyan, K. Rajasekar, JJ
R. Ramachandaran – Appellant
Versus
R. Shilpa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against dismissal of divorce petition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. joint compromise with alimony and property settlement. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. trial court failed to analyze evidence on merits. (Para 5) |
| 4. remand for fresh consideration, possible conversion to mutual consent. (Para 6 , 7) |
The petitioner in O.P.No.126 of 2023, on the file of the Family Court, Krishnagiri, aggrieved by the judgment dated 20.08.2024 dismissing the said O.P. is on appeal before us.
2.The said petition had been filed under Section 13 (1) (i) (i-b) of Hindu Marriage Act, seeking dissolution of marriage solemnized between the appellant and the respondent on 15.11.2013 at Karnataka.
3.We heard extensive arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent. We are also informed that a joint compromise memo had been entered into between the parties/appellant and the respondent on 16.03.2026 and the same had also been forwarded to us. In the joint compromise memo, the appellant herein had undertaken to give a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- towards permanent alimony and also to execute the sale deed/settlement deed in favour of the respondent with respect to a property
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
