Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.Velmurugan, K.Govindarajanthilakavadi, JJ
Rayadurai – Appellant
Versus
Arbitrator/District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. land acquisition under nh act for highway; compensation based on market value at s.3a notification. (Para 2 , 7 , 10) |
| 2. claimant seeks house site valuation; respondents defend agricultural rate with data evidence. (Para 4) |
| 3. limited judicial review under arbitration act; no re-appreciation of evidence or enhancement. (Para 6 , 9 , 11 , 13) |
| 4. appeal lacks merit; award and section 34 dismissal upheld. (Para 14) |
This appeal is filed by the claimant/land owner against the fair and decreetal order dated 21.12.2020 passed in Arbitration O.P.No.175 of 2019 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Villupuram.
2. The brief facts which are necessary for disposal of this appeal are as follows:
The lands in Survey Nos.263/9B, 263/9, 263/10A, 263/10B, 263/11A, 263/12, 263/13, 263/14A and 263/15A, situated in Chinnasalem Village, Chinnasalem Taluk, Villupuram District, belonging to the appellant/land owner, were acquired by the 2nd respondent for laying 4-way lane road under the National Highways Authorities Act for the Salem-Ulundurpet section of National Highway No.68. The 2nd respondent had considered the land as Manai land and, after collecting 262 sales statistics for t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
