Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Nirmal Kumar, J
R. Chandrasekaran – Appellant
Versus
State represented by The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch (DCB), Kancheepuram District. (Crime No.9 of 2024) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners accused of forgery and cheating via power misuse. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties reached amicable compromise during investigation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. quashing allowed despite non-compoundable offences per sc guidelines. (Para 5) |
| 4. petition allowed, fir and investigation quashed. (Para 6) |
O R D E R
The petitioners / A1 & A2 in Crime No.9 of 2024 for offences under Sections 465, 468, 471, 420 and 34 IPC on the file of the 1st respondent Police has filed this Criminal Original Petition.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant executed a General Power of Attorney on 08.05.2023 in favour of the 1st petitioner for the purpose of developing and selling his property measuring 0.27 ½ cents. It is claimed that the 1st petitioner misused this power and fraudulently transferred the property to his wife / 2nd petitioner through a sale deed dated 13.05.2024. Further, in order to execute the sale deed, the 1st petitioner fabricated a Life Certificate of the defacto complainant using forged signatures, purportedly issued by one Dr. Kumar / A3. Further it is alleged that a cheque for Rs.50,00,000/- issued by the 1st petitioner was dishonoured with the remark
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
