IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
Tmt.Ganga – Appellant
Versus
State Tax Officer, Palakkarai Assessment Circle – Respondent
W.M.P.(MD) Nos.7982 & 7984 of 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges assessment order under tngst act s.73. (Para 1) |
| 2. order ignores reply citing s.16(5) on input tax credit. (Para 2) |
| 3. order quashed for non-application of mind; remanded. (Para 3) |
O R D E R
This Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated
02.08.2024, which is an order of assessment passed under Section 73 of the TNGST Act.
2. Upon considering the impugned order of assessment, it is seen that it also relates to the belated claim of input tax credit. It is further seen that the petitioner had filed a reply referring to Section 16(5) of the Act. However, the said reply has not been considered, and no reasons have been assigned with reference to the contentions raised therein.
3. In view thereof, the impugned order suffers from non-application of mind and is liable to be quashed. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed on the following terms:
i. The impugned order dated 02.08.2024 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the file of the first respondent for fresh consideration.
ii. Apart from the original reply, it is open for the petitioner to file an additional reply, if any and produce additional documents, if any, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a web copy of this order, without waiting for the certified copy of the order.
iii. Thereafter, it is for the first respondent to consider the matter afresh and pass orders in accordance with law.
iv. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.