SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 39025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
R.Sudhakar – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner (GST Appeal) – Respondent
W.M.P.(MD) Nos.7765 & 7770 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Raja.Karthikeyan
For the Respondents: Mr.R.Gowri Shankar Senior Standing Counsel

S.16(5) CGST amendment overrides S.16(4) time limit for ITC if GSTR-3B filed by 30.11.2021.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged an assessment order under S.73 of the CGST Act, 2017, disallowing Input Tax Credit (ITC) of Rs.10,29,190/- availed after the due date for GSTR-3B returns under S.39. The court found that amendment introducing S.16(5) permitted ITC claims for 2017-2018 to 2020-2021 if GSTR-3B filed by 30.11.2021, overriding S.16(4) time limit. Petitioner filed returns on 12.11.2020, rendering ITC timely, but order ignored this. Issues framed around validity of ITC availment post-due date in light of S.16(5). Ratio: Amendment S.16(5) overrides S.16(4) for specified years if returns filed timely. Writ petition allowed; impugned order set aside and remanded for fresh consideration.

Table of Content
1. challenges assessment disallowing late itc claim (Para 1 , 2)
2. s.16(5) amendment permits itc if gstr-3b filed timely (Para 3)
3. order set aside, remanded for fresh consideration (Para 5)

O R D E R

This Writ Petition is filed challenging the order of assessment dated

30.08.2024 passed by the second respondent under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017, for the financial year 2019-2020.

2. The impugned order has been passed on the ground that the petitioner had availed Input Tax Credit (ITC) to the tune of Rs.10,29,190/- after the due date for furnishing the return in Form GSTR-3B under Section 39 of the CGST Act.

3. Upon perusal of the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition and after hearing the learned counsel on either side, it is evident that by introducing an amendment to Section 16 of the Act in the form of Section 16(5), the Government has permitted taxpayers to claim ITC for the financial years 2017-2018 to 2020-2021, provided that GSTR-3B returns were filed on or before 30.11.2021, thereby overriding the time limit prescribed under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act. In the present case, the petitioner had filed GSTR-3B returns for the relevant period on 12.11.2020 and therefore, the availment of ITC pertaining to the financial year 2019-2020 is to be treated as within time, since the return was filed on or before 30.11.2021. However, the impugned order was passed without taking this into consideration.

5. In view thereof, this Writ Petition is allowed on the following terms:-

i. The impugned order shall stand set aside and the matter shall stand remanded back to the file of the second respondent for fresh consideration.

ii. The petitioner shall appear before the second respondent without fail and file reply and file such documents before the second respondent.

iii.The second respondent, after taking into consideration the observations made supra, shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

iv. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top