SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 39112

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
Prabhuram – Appellant
Versus
Inspector of Police – Respondent
Crl.O.P.No.21648 of 2023|Crl.MP.No.14952 of 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Anil Sandeep
For the Respondents:Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate(crl.side)|Mr.K.A.Ramakrishnan

Petition to quash FIR becomes infructuous after charge sheet filing and cognizance taken.

Headnote:The petitioners filed a criminal original petition under S.482 Cr.P.C. to quash FIR in crime No.427 of 2018 registered by Central Crime Branch. The court noted that investigation was completed, charge sheet filed, and cognizance taken in CC.No.6614 of 2023 by Special Court for CCB/CBCID Cases. No issues framed; petition held infructuous due to charge sheet filing. Petition dismissed as nothing survives for adjudication.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks quashing of fir under s.482 cr.p.c. (Para 1)
2. charge sheet filed; cognizance taken in cc.no.6614/2023. (Para 2)
3. petition dismissed as infructuous; nothing survives. (Para 3)

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.21648 of 2023 and Crl.MP.No.14952 of 2023

1.Prabhuram

2.Prabath ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Team II, EDF-I, Vepery, Chennai 600 007 (crime No.427 of 2018)

2.T.Narendran ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records to the FIR in crime No.427 of 2018 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same as against the petitioners.

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Anil Sandeep For Respondents For R1 : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate(crl.side)

For R2 : Mr.K.A.Ramakrishnan

ORDER

This criminal original petition has been filed to quash the FIR in crime No.427 of 2018 on the file of the first respondent as against the petitioners

2. The learned Government Advocate(crl.side) appearing for the first respondent submitted that after completion of investigation in crime No.427 of 2018 on the file of the first respondent, charge sheet was filed and the same has been taken cognizance in CC.No.6614 of 2023 on the file of the Special Court for CCB/CBCID Cases, Egmore, Chennai.

3. Therefore, nothing survives in this criminal original petition for adjudication. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top