IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.Swaminathan, R.Poornima, JJ
Nagarajan – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram – Respondent
W.P(MD)No.11507 of 2024 | W.M.P(MD)No.10252 of 2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner alleges encroachments on survey no.375. (Para 2) |
| 2. direct sub-collector to remove encroachments after notices. (Para 4) |
(Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.)
Heard both sides.
2.The writ petitioner is a resident of Senthamil Nagar, Paramakudi.
He alleges that in Survey No.375, there are encroachments. He wants the same to be removed.
3.The learned counsel draws our attention to the report dated
21.03.2023 submitted by the Tahsildar, Paramakudi. We are prima facie satisfied that there are encroachments. Since the Tahsildar appears to have already determined the issue, it would not be proper on our part to once again direct them to take action.
4.We therefore direct the second respondent to take action as per law to have the encroachments removed. Notices will have to be issued to all the necessary parties. We make it clear that since the alleged encroachers have not been heard, any observation made in this order shall be treated as tentative and prima facie in nature and shall not have the effect of foreclosing their defence. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5.This Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.