SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 39269

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.SARAVANAN, J
SM Traders – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner (CT), SGST Appeal – Respondent
W.M.P.Nos.13563 and 13567 of 2026



Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr.G.Derrick Sam
For Respondent:Mrs.K.Vasanthamala Government Advocate

GST appeal limitation condoned with 25% pre-deposit for fresh merits adjudication.

Headnote:Under Section 107 of GST Enactments, appeals must be filed within the prescribed limitation period, with 10% pre-deposit of disputed tax. Facts involve rejection of petitioner's appeal against assessment order dated 29.05.2025 for tax period 2023-2024 due to delayed filing, confirmed under Section 16 and Circular No.9/2022. Court finds merit in condoning delay subject to additional deposit. Issues framed as whether appeal rejection solely on limitation was justified despite pre-deposit. Ratio: Remand permissible if substantial compliance with pre-deposit, directing fresh adjudication on merits after reply to show cause notice dated 14.03.2025. Writ petition disposed with directions for 25% total pre-deposit and de novo proceedings by Original Authority.

Table of Content
1. appeal rejected on limitation under s.107. (Para 2 , 3)
2. pre-deposit made; assessment confirmed on non-reply. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. 25% pre-deposit mandated for remand. (Para 9 , 10 , 16 , 17)
4. directions for fresh adjudication and compliance consequences. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 18)

ORDER

Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.

2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.

3. The Petitioner is before this Court against the impugned Order dated 11.09.2025 whereby the Petitioner’s appeal against the Order dated 29.05.2025 has been rejected as the appeal was filed beyond the limitation period prescribed under Section 107 of the respective GST Enactments.

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that at the time of filing of appeal before the Appellate Authority herein, the Petitioner has deposited 10% of the disputed tax covered by the order dated 29.05.2025 and the same stands recorded in the impugned Order dated 11.09.2025 in Form GST APL-02.

5. A reading of the Order passed by the Original Authority namely the State Tax Officer, Annur Circle, Annur dated 29.05.2025 for the Tax Period 2023-2024 in response to a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 14.03.2025 indicates that the Petitioner has not replied to the Show Cause Notice dated 14.03.2025 despite reminders dated 22.04.2025 and 12.05.2025.

6. The demand has been confirmed against the Petitioner taking note of the Scheme of Section 16 of the respective GST Enactments and taking note of Circular No.9 of 2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.07.2022

7. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that post facto the entire balance amount was also recovered on 12.02.2026.

8. Learned Government Advocate for the Respondent is however unable to confirm the same.

9. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to deposit 15% of the disputed tax over and above 10% of the disputed tax already deposited at the time of filing the appeal and has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court Bundle, which is extracted hereunder:-

The Petitioner undertake to pay additional

15% of tax demand in excess to 10% pre-deposit made on 02.09.2025 less amount already recovered.”

10. Considering the fact that the Petitioner has already deposited

10% of the disputed tax at the time of filing of appeal, this case is remitted back to the Original Authority namely the Commercial Tax Officer to pass a fresh order on merits in lieu of Order dated 29.05.2025 subject to the Petitioner depositing additionally 15% of the disputed tax over and above the amount that was deposited on 02.09.2025 at the time of filing of appeal before the Respondent herein.

11. Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 14.03.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the Original Assessment Order dated 29.05.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated

14.03.2025.

12. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Original Authority shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply / pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically vacated.

13. It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the deposit of additional 15% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

14. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top