SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 39441

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. ASHA
Manba-ul-ula Higher Secondary School – Appellant
Versus
The Government of Tamil Nadu – Respondent



##PAGE1##

WP No. 10963 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA

WP No. 10963 of 2026 Manba-ul-ula Higher Secondary School

Rep. by its correspondent, S.M.Anwardeein,

No.51, Chinnapalli Street, Koothanallur, Thiruvarur District,

Tamil Nadu-614 101 ..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary School Education

Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009

2. The Joint Director of School Education (Secondary Education)

Directorate of School Education, D.P.I. Complex, college Road, Chennai-600 006

3. The Chief Educational Officer Thiruvarur,

Thiruvarur District-610 004

4. The District Educational Officer Thiruvarur,

Thiruvarur District-610 004

..Respondent(s)

__________

Page1 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/04/2026 05:34:22 pm )

##PAGE2##

WP No. 10963 of 2026

Prayer: - Writ petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for all documents relating to the order passed by the 4th respondent in O.Mu.No.0027/A3/ 2025 dated 04.07.2025 and quash the same s illegal and arbitrary and direct the respondents the 4th respondent to approve the appointment of the one Karpaga Lakshmi on the basis of the proposal submitted by the petitioner school in Na.Ka. No.57 of 2024 dated 25.10.2025 and give all service benefits of J.Karpaga Lakshmi from

the date of her initial appointment.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Ajith Kumar For Respondent(s): Ms. Mythreye Chandru for R1 to R4.

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed for the following reliefs:-

“calling for all documents relating to the order passed by the 4th

respondent in O.Mu.No.0027/A3/ 2025 dated 04.07.2025 and quash the same s illegal and arbitrary and direct the respondents the 4th respondent to approve the appointment of the one Karpaga Lakshmi on the basis of the proposal submitted by the petitioner school in Na.Ka. No.57 of 2024 dated 25.10.2025 and give all service benefits of J.Karpaga Lakshmi from the date of her initial

appointment. Brief Facts:-

__________

Page2 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/04/2026 05:34:22 pm )

##PAGE3##

WP No. 10963 of 2026

2. The petitioner school was established in the year 1939 by the Manba-

ul-Ula Society, Koothanallur, registered on 13.05.1919 before the Sub-Registrar Office, Tanjore. The school initially had classes from LKG to V Standard, which was later upgraded as a Middle School on 01.06.1946, and is presently

functioning up to 10th Standard.

3. The petitioner is a Government-aided minority private educational

institution and is entitled to administer the institution, including the right to make appointments, in accordance with law. It is submitted that one Tmt.Jayanthi was working as a Tamil Teacher in a sanctioned post of B.T. Assistant and retired from service on 31.05.2020 on attaining the age of

superannuation, thereby giving rise to a regular sanctioned vacancy.

4. Thereafter, the petitioner, in order to fill up the said vacancy, appointed

Tmt. J. Karpaga Lakshmi as B.T. Assistant (Tamil) in the sanctioned post vide proceedings in Na.Ka.No.57 of 2024 dated 10.06.2024. She joined duty on the

same day and has been continuously working in the said post.

5. Thereafter, the petitioner had submitted a proposal dated 25.10.2024 to

the 4th respondent seeking approval of the said appointment. However, the 4th __________

Page3 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 30/04/2026 05:34:22 pm )

##PAGE4##

WP No. 10963 of 2026

respondent, by the impugned order dated 04.07.2025, rejected the proposal on the ground that the said J. Karpaga Lakshmi had secured only 44.47% marks in her undergraduate course and was therefore not eligible for approval as per G.O.Ms.No.22, School Education Department, dated 13.01.2023, which prescribes a minimum of 50% marks in the undergraduate course. Challenging

the same, the petitioner is before this Court.

6. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top