2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 39448
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
M.Senthilkumar – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
##PAGE1##
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 24.03.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN
W.P.(MD)No.7855 of 2026
M.Senthilkumar ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector, Karur District, Karur.
2.The District Revenue Office, Collectorate Campus, Karur, Karur District. 3.The Sub Collector,
Kulithalai, Karur District.
4.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office,
Kulithalai, Karur District.
5.S.Vijayakumar
6.Sagunthala
7.V.Santhi ...Respondents
PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1, 3 & 4 herein to remove the encroachments made by the respondents 5 to 7 in
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/04/2026 04:27:08 pm )
##PAGE2##the Village Cart Track and Tharisu land situated at S.Nos.514/1 and
514/2 of Inungur Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murugappan For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam (R1 to R4)
Government Advocate
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)
The petitioner seeks a direction to direct the respondents 1, 3 &
4 herein to remove the encroachments made by the respondents 5 to 7 in the Village Cart Track and Tharisu land situated at S.Nos.514/1 and
514/2 of Inungur Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District.
2.According to the petitioner, the property is classified as
Panchayat cart track and it has been encroached by the private respondents. Since the representation submitted by the petitioner in this regard has not been considered, the petitioner has come up before this
Court.
3.The learned Government Advocate appearing for the official
respondents submits that Survey No.514 has been sub-divided into
2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/04/2026 04:27:08 pm )
##PAGE3##various survey numbers and pattas have been issued to the private
individuals.
4.We have heard the learned counsel appearing on either side
and perused the materials placed on record.
5.When we carefully perused the affidavit filed in support of
this writ petition, we are of the view that the petitioner seeks to establish his easmentary right. It is well settled that such disputed questions, particularly those relating to title, possession, and easementary rights, cannot be adjudicated in proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The proper remedy for the petitioner is to approach the competent Civil Court for appropriate relief, where evidence can be
adduced and the issues can be decided on merits.
6.Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
[N.S.K., J.] & [M.J.R., J.]
24.03.2026 Index :Yes/No
Internet :Yes ta
3/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/04/2026 04:27:08 pm )
##PAGE4##To
1.The District Collector, Karur District, Karur.
2.The District Revenue Office, Collectorate Campus, Karur, Karur District. 3.The Sub Collector,
Kulithalai, Karur District.
4.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office,
Kulithalai, Karur District.
4/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/04/2026 04:27:08 pm )
##PAGE5##N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
AND M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.
ta
W.P.(MD)No.7855 of 2026
24.03.2026
5/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 29/04/2026 04:27:08 pm )