SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 39523

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
Arumugasamy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.03.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and W.M.P(MD) Nos.15575, 15577, 15580, 15582 and 23455 of 2023

1.Arumugasamy

2.Robert Singh

3.Santhanakumar

4.Dhayalan

5.Karunakaran ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Principal Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Director of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

3.The Member Secretary, Medical Services Recruitment Board (MRB), 359, Anna Salai, DMS Compound, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 018. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned Provisional Selection List issued by the 3rd respondent in PSL No.08/MRB/2022, dated 04.11.2022 and the consequent impugned order passed by the second respondent in Ref.No. 6177/E5/1/2023, dated 14.02.2023 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to include the name of the petitioners in the selection list for appointment to the post of Dark Room Assistant, based on the marks secured by the petitioners in the selection by reckoning CRA candidates with or without science in Higher Secondary Course as single category in accordance with Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Medical Subordinate Service as amended.

For Petitioners : Mr.K.Navaneetharaja For R1 and R2 : Mr.B.Ramanathan For R3 : Mr.V.Ramesh

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned provisional selection list issued by the 3rd respondent in PSL No. 08/MRB/2022, dated 04.11.2022 and the consequential impugned order passed by the second respondent in Ref. No.6177/E5/1/2023, dated 14.02.2023 and to quash the same. The petitioners also seek a consequential direction to the respondents to include their names in the selection list for appointment to the post of Dark Room Assistant, based on the marks secured by them in the selection process, by reckoning candidates possessing Certificate of Radiological Assistant (CRA) with or without science in the Higher Secondary Course as a single category, in accordance with the Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Medical Subordinate Service as amended.

2. All the five petitioners participated in the recruitment process conducted by the 3rd respondent for filling up the post of Dark Room Assistant pursuant to the notification dated 16.03.2022. In terms of the said notification read with the rules governing the post and G.O.(Ms) No. 385, Health and Family Welfare Department, dated 27.08.2021, candidates possessing a Certificate of Dark Room Assistant with Higher Secondary Course (HSC) qualification are eligible. As per the proviso to the prescribed qualifications, in the absence of candidates possessing a Certificate of Dark Room Assistant, candidates possessing a Certificate of Radiological Assistant with HSC qualification, with or without science, are also eligible for appointment.

3. In the present case, since candidates possessing a Certificate of Dark Room Assistant were not available, the petitioners, who possess Certificates of Radiological Assistant with HSC qualification, with or without science, are eligible to be considered. In the said recruitment process, the petitioners secured the following marks:

4. However, the 3rd respondent, instead of selecting the petitioners based on merit, excluded them from the recruitment process on the ground that they had not studied science subjects in the Higher Secondary Course. The recruitment was confined only to candidates possessing a Certificate of Radiological Assistant with science subjects in HSC. Consequently, candidates who secured lesser marks than the petitioners in the respective categories were provisionally selected through the impugned provisional selection list dated 04.11.2022. Aggrieved by the same, as well as the subsequent clarification issued by the se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top